Hi there, when I decided to take up photography a bit more serious than being a "snapper", I did not want to break the bank, just in case it being a fluke, and got myself a Bridge (Samsung WB5000).
Now, although this sort of does the trick, I start realizing it is not a fluke, and I might need something more "beefy".
Having some "spare time" yesterday, prior to a client-visit, I stepped into a camera-shop, and asked for advice, on what to go for.
The first thing he did was slag off my camera, which boded well for the rest of the conversation, and then he told me this was not because of the camera, but because of the brand, since Samsung was not a camera-manufacturer.
Then he told me I had 4 options, Canon and Nikon, or Pentax and Olympus, which were all true-bloods. Phew, what a relief, because a Canon or Nikon were first on my list, because everyone recommends them .... aaarggggh, so wrong. He then told me to forget about them, and advised the following:The support for these recommendations (and in this order) was because they had features available that with Canon and Nikon would cost more money, and the lens choices would be a lot more versatile and cheaper.
- Pentax Kx
- Olympus E-620
What do you think, and more importantly, recommend??
Much appreciated
Fred



, and then he told me this was not because of the camera, but because of the brand, since Samsung was not a camera-manufacturer.
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks